Pages

Showing posts with label vs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label vs. Show all posts

Saturday, July 15, 2017

Disinterested vs Uninterested—Are They the Same

Disinterested vs Uninterested—Are They the Same



 
Disinterested vs. Uninterested�Are They the Same?
 
Disinterested means �without a vested interest.� Uninterested means �not showing interest.� The words disinterested and uninterested are sometimes used as if they have the same�
 
Clip Betterhttp://www.grammarly.com/blog/disinterested-uninter�
 
View Now
 


Read more »

Saturday, June 10, 2017

DINKER VS KEKO NOOBS

DINKER VS KEKO NOOBS


There has always been crazy amount of newbies sitting in the most popular public channel in ROC community - KEKO. Starting from today, I will be owning some of those lucky newbies when I get a chance. Replays will be posted on Replayers and I will also give short brief of the games and situations before and after the games. You can find all info in "My corner" tab in the thread called KEKO noobs.
Read more »

Tuesday, June 6, 2017

DialogTV vs SLT PeoTV

DialogTV vs SLT PeoTV


This article does not wish to market any SLT or Dialog products by any means.

I have been a consumer of DialogTV and SLT PeoTV for some time now. We have PeoTV at home and DialogTV at my uncles. Since some people have asked me about their qualities (specially about PeoTV) I thought of putting an article comparing the user experience you will get. I will not discuss about their monthly rentals or initial costs or whatever because there are official ways to get them.

Another thing to mention is that these details are gained from my experience. The details may vary for you or other customers.

Installation

DialogTV
As you may know, DialogTV uses a dish antenna and the receiver unit located near your television will get the signal from it. The receiver unit have several video-outs to be received by a television or any display device. Recently, guys from Dialog came and they replaced our receiver unit with a different model. This model basically sucks! It has old-style menus and the previous one was very user-friendly than the new one. I dont know why this happened but if you have a simillar story please do tell in the comments section.

PeoTV
PeoTV needs an ADSL connection to operate though the receiver unit is not directly connected to the telephone line. The receiver has an ethernet port where you can give an output from an ADSL router. Assuming you have another computer at home, both the computer and the receiver can be connected to the router. When we bought PeoTV they provided a 4-port router. But that router model has very limited capabilities compared to a usual D-Link or Prolink router we use. As I remember, its make is UTStarcom.

Startup Time

Both DialogTV and PeoTV has an initial delay to display the TV channel on screen. For DialogTV, this is only a single phase. You switch on the device, it scans the signal then it starts displaying video.

For PeoTV, there are two delays. Assuming you havent connected to internet already, the router needs some time to connect to internet through ADSL. Then the receiver unit needs some time to connect to the PeoTV server and begin downloading channel menus and the video stream.

Intial delay for PeoTV appears significantly larger than the delay of DialogTV.

User Experience

This is the most important aspect of any commercial product, but there are significant shortcomings of PeoTV in this area.

Navigation in Channel Menus
Basically the PeoTV receiver unit is an internet video streaming device. It connects to the video server through internet and display video outputs on the TV screen. Channel menus are merely web pages (and poorly designed ones too) which takes ages to load. I know this because some times it displays "Web page unavailable offline" error message on the TV screen. Even when the menu is fully displayed its very hard to navigate and select channels. The device is very slow to respond to key presses from the remote. For example, when you press the arrow key it takes like half-a-second to move the selection rectangle to the next item. Its like browsing the internet in a very slow computer!

Before you jump into any wrong conclusions, I have to say theres no problem with our ADSL connection. It operates really fast as expected when browsing the internet and we can watch YouTube videos straight away without waiting for buffering.

Jumping Between Channels
As most of us do, another way to change channels is by using the Channel Up-Down keys on the remote. This is faster than going to the channel menu since theres no need to load and display a web page. You just jump straightly to another channel. Although this is possible on PeoTV, the device literary gets stucked if you do it too much! By "too much" I mean the normal usage pattern of any user. We tend to change channels frequently and we dont have to think about the strain it puts on the device!

You dont have problems like this in DialogTV. When you need to change the channel you go to menu and just change it. Thats it. It very much responsive than PeoTV.

Video Quality
Theres not much to whine about video picture quality in PeoTV. In fact it is pretty good. Theres an initial shuttering for few seconds just after you switch to a channel but thats excusable since the video stream needs some time to be buffered.

With DialogTV you have these occasional glitches of squares appearing and stucked video which is pretty annoying. This maybe due to effects of the ionosphere on the singal transmitted from the sattelite. Other than that, the experience is the same as PeoTV.

Time-Shift TV

This is a facility solely provided by PeoTV. Despite all other shortcomings, PeoTV can get ver useful with this facility. Time-Shift allows you to go back in time (up-to 48 hours) and watch any program that was telecasted within the last 48 hours. You get fast-forward and rewind capabilities when you are watching anything. Even if you are watching a live cricket match you can rewind the video and watch the places you missed. (Of course you CANNOT fast-forward into future!)

Theres no alternative provided by DialogTV for this facility.

My Favorite Channels

This part is fairly personalized. Some of my favorite channels are missing from PeoTV. Although Discovery and National Geographic are available on both, I miss AXN, Pogo and ZeeCafe from PeoTV. PeoTV does not provide any other channels worth watching either.

Conclusions

Considering all these facts, it seems DialogTV provides a better user experience. On the other hand, PeoTV provides the time-shift facility which maybe loved by some users. In short, DialogTV is simple and responsive while PeoTV is complex and bloated. This is a good example showing that when we incorporate more and more featured high-tech devices into our lives, we have to face the overhead they puts on us. Nor DialogTV, nor PeoTV is as simple as classic television we get from the good-old RF antenna!

Please put your experience on the comments section.
.
.

Update

Theres another very disturbing fact about PeoTV. If you have both PeoTV and ADSL, you HAVE to use the same crappy router they are providing to access internet as well. If you plug your own router, you will be able to access ADSL, but PeoTV wont work. PeoTV receiver unit requires the provided router in order to access PeoTV server.

This is inexcusible since their so called router has very limited functionality. It requires "dialing" (PPPoE) to connect to internet which has few drawbacks including single-user limitation and lack of support on Linux platforms! So if you are a heavy internet user with multiple computers you might be better off with DialogTV.
Read more »

Thursday, June 1, 2017

Devil Summoner VS Persona

Devil Summoner VS Persona





DOWNLOAD
Read more »

Thursday, May 11, 2017

Devil Summoner 2 Raidou Kuzunoha vs King Abaddon

Devil Summoner 2 Raidou Kuzunoha vs King Abaddon


Yakk~ ini dia game yg baru aja gw tamatin di liburan natal dan taon baru kali ini. Sebenernya ni game uda gw maenin dari pas gw kelas 8, brati 2 taon yg lalu, tp baru tamat sekarang karena dulu gw bener2 unskilled gamer -_-

Jadi gw lanjutin skarang pas gw uda klas X... Nahh jd sesuai judulnya. Game ini nyritain soal si Raidou Kuzunoha the 14th (keturunan ke 14). Devil summoner dari clan kuzunoha. Clan kuzunoha bukan cuma raidou doang, ada Geirin Kuzunoha ke ...th bgitulah. Macem2 pkoknya tp yg muncul cuma raidou sama geirin di seri ini.


Tugas dari clan kuzunoha ini itu untuk protect the capital. Jadi latar belakang dari cerita ini tu kayak semacam si zaman edo gitu. Jepang pas zaman dulu kalo gw liat dari kota2nya sama orang-orangnya.


Devil Summoner yaa sesuai namanya, mereka bisa summon demon buat ngebantu mereka ngejalanin pekerjaannya. Dan si raidou kuzunoha the 14th ini bekerja di narumi detective agency, jd kita bisa ngerjain case file case file gitu kayak detective (emang detective). Trus stiap elemen demon itu (ada pyro, pagan, frost, dll) punya kelebihan masing2 yg dipake buat investigation. Misalnya pagan punya kemampuan read mind. Pokoknha seru dah. Caranya kita dapetin demon juga dengan negotiation pas battlefield ato dengan fusion. Cara fusionnya more or less ga jauh beda lah sama cara fusion di persona series.


Gw sih pertama maenin ni game dulu karna liat di forum pd asik ngmngin ni game. Akhirnya gw coba ikutan. Soalnya dia sama2 Shin Megami Tensei series sih sama kayak Persona. Makanya gw tertarik wkwkwk. Dan ni game lebih susah dari persona jelas.. -_-


Tp akhirnya gw tamat jg dengan ending law. Jd ada 3 ending: law, neutral sama chaos.


Katanya sih bedanya cuma efeknya pas di 2nd playthrough, tp gw blm tau juga.

Raidou gw terakhir level 80 pas di dungeon terakhir~

Demon yg gw pake di dungeon terakhir cuma 2: beelzebub sama shiva.

Tapi yg gw bawa ya ga cuma 2 -_- soalnya hampir semua tipe demon dibutuhin di sini buat ngelewatin jebakan. Kalo ga salah nama dungeonnya "infinite abyss abaddon". Wkwkwk.

Jd jntinya gw lumayan bahagia ni game tamat juga... Ga nyesel dah main ni game. Alur ceritanya seru, gameplay nya juga unik.

Sekarang gw lagi main Kingdom Hearts 2. Nanti gw review juga deh daripada blog gw sepi wkwkwkwk


Published with Blogger-droid v2.0.1
Read more »

Wednesday, May 3, 2017

Difference Between Speed vs Bandwidth The Age Old Question

Difference Between Speed vs Bandwidth The Age Old Question


Bandwidth

Bandwidth vs Speed

Bandwidth is a very old term that predates the advent of computers and all other digital technologies. It is widely used in analog technologies like radio transmission, acoustics, and many others. In computing, bandwidth is often used to indicate the amount of data that is being, or can be, transferred at a given time. This is often measured in bits per second with common values expressed in thousands (kilobits per second), millions (megabits per second), and in billions (gigabits per second). Speed is simply a description of how fast things can be done. In computing, speed and bandwidth are often used interchangeably since they often mean the same thing.

A very good example when bandwidth would directly correlate to speed is when you are downloading a file across the network or Internet. Greater bandwidth means that more of the file is being transferred at any given time. The file would be therefore be downloaded faster. This is also applicable when you are browsing the Internet as greater bandwidth would result in web pages loading faster and video streaming to be smoother.

But in certain cases, speed and bandwidth do not literally mean the same thing. This is true when you talk about real time applications like VoIP or online gaming. In these cases, latency or response time is more important than having more bandwidth. Even if you have a lot of bandwidth, you may experience choppy voice transmission or response lag if your latency is too high. Upgrading your bandwidth would probably not help since it would no longer be used. Latency can’t be upgraded easily as it requires that any noise be minimized as well as the amount of time that it takes for packets to move from source to destination and vice versa.

To obtain the best possible speed for your network or Internet connection, it is not enough to have a high bandwidth connection. It is also important that your latency is low, to ensure that the information reaches you quickly enough. This only matters though if you have enough bandwidth as low latencies without enough bandwidth would still result in a very slow connection.

 

 

Summary:

1. Bandwidth is a measurement of how much data can be transferred at a time while speed is a measurement of how fast things are done

2. Bandwidth and speed can be synonymous when measuring how fast you can download a file

3. Bandwidth may not directly translate to speed in real time applications

 

VIA

http://www.differencebetween.net/technology/internet/difference-between-bandwidth-and-speed/

http://broadband-nation.blogspot.com/2007/06/speed-vs-bandwidththe-age-old-question.html

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Latency versus Bandwidth - What is it?

One of the most commonly misunderstood concepts in networking is speed and capacity. Most people believe that capacity and speed are the same thing. For example, its common to hear "How fast is your connection?" Invariably, the answer will be "640K", "1.5M" or something similar. These answers are actually referring to the bandwidth or capacity of the service, not speed.

Speed and bandwidth are interdependent. The combination of latency and bandwidth gives users the perception of how quickly a webpage loads or a file is transferred. It doesnt help that broadband providers keep saying "get high speed access" when they probably should be saying "get high capacity access". Notice the term "Broadband" - it refers to how wide the pipe is, not how fast.

Latency:

Latency is delay.

For our purposes, it is the amount of time it takes a packet to travel from source to destination. Together, latency and bandwidth define the speed and capacity of a network.

Latency is normally expressed in milliseconds. One of the most common methods to measure latency is the utility ping. A small packet of data, typically 32 bytes, is sent to a host and the RTT (round-trip time, time it takes for the packet to leave the source host, travel to the destination host and return back to the source host) is measured.

The following are typical latencies as reported by others of popular circuits type to the first hop. Please remember however that latency on the Internet is also affected by routing that an ISP may perform (ie, if your data packet has to travel further, latencies increase).


Ethernet .3msAnalog Modem 100-200msISDN 15-30msDSL/Cable 10-20msStationary Satellite >500ms, mostly due to high orbital elevationDS1/T1 2-5ms

Bandwidth:

Bandwidth is normally expressed in bits per second. Its the amount of data that can be transferred during a second.

Solving bandwidth is easier than solving latency. To solve bandwidth, more pipes are added. For example, in early analog modems it was possible to increase bandwidth by bonding two or more modems. In fact, ISDN achieves 128K of bandwidth by bonding two 64K channels using a datalink protocol called multilink-ppp.

Bandwidth and latency are connected. If the bandwidth is saturated then congestion occurs and latency is increased. However, if the bandwidth of a circuit is not at peak, the latency will not decrease. Bandwidth can always be increased but latency cannot be decreased. Latency is the function of the electrical characteristics of the circuit.

via

http://www.dslreports.com/faq/694

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

About Bandwidth

Internet bandwidth is, in simple terms, the transmission speed or throughput of your connection to the Internet. However, measuring bandwidth can be tricky, since the lowest bandwidth point between your computer and the site youre looking at determines the effective transmission speed at any moment.

Three factors outside of your computer control how quickly you can view Web pages:

  1. The Internet bandwidth between your computer and the site youre viewing.

  2. The round-trip time between your computer and the site youre viewing.

  3. The response time of the site youre viewing.

The tests referenced on this page address the first issue, and measure the Internet bandwidth between your computer and PC Pitstops servers. We also have tests that can measure the round-trip time between your computer and seven different sites on the Internet, here. Of course, the response time of our site will always be wonderful...:) (If not, well tell you on the home page.)

Tests: Download vs. Upload

The differences between our Download and Upload tests arent as obvious as they may initially seem. Yes, the basic difference is the direction of the data transfer: Simply put, the Download test measures your connection speed for viewing Web pages; the upload test measures the speed for maintaining them--or sending data over your connection.

However, the rated upload and download speeds may not be the same for your connection. Some connections, such as 33K and lower, are "symmetric," meaning the rated upload and download times should be the same. Other connections, such as cable modems and ADSL, are "asymmetric" (the "A" in ADSL stands for asymmetric). This means the upload and download times wont necessarily be the same; upload times are generally not as fast as download times. For instance, the rated speeds for ADSL are 1.4Mbps down, and 400Kbps up. Cable modems are typically rated at 1.5 to 3Mbps down, and 400 to 600Kbps up.

Occasionally, you may even see opposite results, especially on cable modems during the evening hours. If your connection has a heavy user load, the download times may suffer, while the upload times remain unchanged. This is because the majority of Internet users download data instead of uploading it.

Bottom line: You should regularly run our bandwidth tests to make sure youre getting the rated upload and download speeds from your connection.

About throughput and reproducibility

The Internet changes from one moment to the next in ways that are impossible to predict. You cannot expect to see the same bandwidth value every time you measure it. Furthermore, you cannot expect to see the full nominal speed of your connection for your bandwidth measurement: There are always delays somewhere. As a rule of thumb, if you can measure throughput that is 85% of your nominal bandwidth, more often than not your connection is performing at par. (You may need to contact your service provider or modem manufacturer to determine the rated speed of your connection and/or modem.)

This is especially true with modems. Most 56Kbps modems connect at a speed less than 46Kbps, because of the limitations of analog phone lines and telephone company switches.

To get the best picture of your Internet bandwidth, test several times. Also test at different times of the day: Your bandwidth measurement at 7 AM may be much better than your bandwidth measurement at 10 PM.

About bandwidth units

You will often see bandwidth and transfer speed quoted in two different units: kilobits per second, abbreviated kbps or Kb/s, and kilobytes per second, abbreviated KB/s. The difference between the two units is the number of bits in a byte, which is 8. The small b stands for bits, and the big B stands for bytes. Transfer speeds are often shown in KB/s, and connect speeds are usually quoted in Kb/s.

So, for instance, if a progress dialog for a modem shows you a download speed of 4.3 KB/s, it is the same as 34.4 Kb/s. If a progress dialog for a cable modem shows you a transfer speed of 100 KB/s, it is the same as 800 Kb/s.

We display our measured transfer speeds in Kb/s, to make them easier to compare with your rated line speed.

About bandwidth and modems

Bandwidth over a modem connection can sometimes be difficult to understand. There are two connections to a modem: one from your computer to its modem, and one from the computers modem to the ISPs modem.

The connection speed between the computer and its modem (called the Maximum speed under Control Panel/Modem/General tab/Properties) should be set as high as possible without causing errors. On most computers this is 115200, also written as 115.2 Kb/s.

The connection speed between your modem and the ISPs, and the compression and error checking, are negotiated between the two modems when they establish the call. In the very best possible case, which is rarely seen, two V.90 (56 Kb/s) modems will be able to connect at 53 Kb/s with compression, and the compression on normal text transfer will average 50%, giving an effective transmission rate of 106 Kb/s. Very highly compressible material could be transferred at the maximum rate of 115.2 Kb/s. Incompressible material like ZIP files could be transferred at a maximum rate of 53 Kb/s.

Our download test transmits an incompressible block of random text. The theoretical maximum transfer speed for this over a V.90 modem is 53 Kb/s, if there was no latency at all on the line--that is, if there was no delay between the times your computer asked for a packet, our computer sent it, and your computer received it. With normal latency, however, transfer speeds are reduced to roughly 85% of the maximum, which for a V.90 modem would be about 45 Kb/s. If your modem connects to your ISP at the more typical 44 Kb/s, then you can expect our 

via

http://www.pcpitstop.com/internet/bandwidth_about.asp

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bandwidth (computing)

In computer networking and computer science, bandwidth,[1] network bandwidth,[2] data bandwidth,[3] or digital bandwidth[4][5] is a bit rate measure of available or consumed data communication resources expressed in bits/second or multiples of it (kilobits/s, megabits/s etc.).

Note that in textbooks on wireless communications, modem data transmission, digital communications, electronics, etc., bandwidth refers to analog signal bandwidth measured in hertz—the original meaning of the term. Some computer networking authors prefer less ambiguous terms such as bit rate, channel capacity and throughput rather than bandwidth in bit/s, to avoid this confusion.In computer networking and computer science, bandwidth,[1] network bandwidth,[2] data bandwidth,[3] or digital bandwidth[4][5] is a bit rate measure of available or consumed data communication resources expressed in bits/second or multiples of it (kilobits/s, megabits/s etc.).

Note that in textbooks on wireless communications, modem data transmission, digital communications, electronics, etc., bandwidth refers to analog signal bandwidth measured in hertz—the original meaning of the term. Some computer networking authors prefer less ambiguous terms such as bit rate, channel capacity and throughput rather than bandwidth in bit/s, to avoid this confusion.

 

This table shows the maximum bandwidth (the physical layer net bitrate) of common Internet access technologies. For a more detailed list see list of device bandwidths, bit rate progress trends and list of bit rates in multimedia.

56 kbit/s Modem / Dialup
1.5 Mbit/s ADSL Lite
1.544 Mbit/s T1/DS1
10 Mbit/s Ethernet
11 Mbit/s Wireless 802.11b
44.736 Mbit/s T3/DS3
54 Mbit/s Wireless 802.11g
100 Mbit/s Fast Ethernet
155 Mbit/s OC3
600 Mbit/s Wireless 802.11n
622 Mbit/s OC12
1 Gbit/s Gigabit Ethernet
2.5 Gbit/s OC48
9.6 Gbit/s OC192
10 Gbit/s 10 Gigabit Ethernet
100 Gbit/s 100 Gigabit Ethernet

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandwidth_(computing)

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

The Bandwidth Debate: Video and Net Neutrality

Video is creating huge increases in bandwidth usage. It currently generates more traffic in the US than was transmitted across the entire Internet backbone in 2000. While the Internet is not about to collapse, as video becomes the primary online delivery vehicle for entertainment, news and sports, the system will strain.

The Bandwidth Debate report analyzes the impact of the growth of online video content on the Internet transmission backbone, its availability and cost.

Looking at the future of the Internet, none of the players seem happy. ISPs insist that the costs of building out Internet capacity should not fall solely on them. Further, the proliferation of professional video content online—mainly TV shows and full-length movies—threatens the business model of cable companies, who are also major ISPs in most of the US.

On the other hand, companies invested in the TV business (networks, studios and cable providers) as well as major Internet players (Google, Microsoft and Yahoo!) and smaller sites all hope to carve out a share of the potential profits of video—and they are nervous, too.

In that light, the debate over network or Internet neutrality—Net neutrality, for short—is a power play, with involved parties using bandwidth issues as negotiating tactics for divvying up the pie.

Of course, as corporations scramble, consumers could be collateral damage. That is because several ISPs are looking to limit their customers’ bandwidth usage through techniques such as monthly download caps (often called throttling) and differentiated service tiers. The problem could even spill over to online video and advertising.

 

Monthly Consumer Internet Traffic Worldwide, by Segment, 2006-2012 (petabytes)

Key questions “The Bandwidth Debate” report answers:

  • How does the growth of online video shape the Net neutrality battle?
  • How much does video strain bandwidth capacities?
  • How could changes in ISP service offerings hurt online advertising?
  • How will government involvement affect Internet service offerings?
  • Can the ground rules for Internet usage be clarified?
  • And many others…
  • eMarketer Reports—On Target and Up to Date

    The Bandwidth Debate report aggregates the latest data from international technical, marketing and communications researchers with eMarketer analysis to provide the information you need to make smart, timely business decisions.    

    via

    http://www.emarketer.com/Reports/All/Emarketer_2000535.aspx

     

     

    OTHER TOPIC RELATED


    Internet-speedtest

    http://www.speedtest.net/

    Internet-speed
    Internet-highspeed

    http://www.squidoo.com/top-10-ways-to-speedup-your-internet-speed

    http://blogs.cisco.com/news/global-internet-expansion-who-will-lead-the-way/

    http://blogs.cisco.com/tag/internet-traffic/

    http://blogs.cisco.com/news/global-internet-expansion-who-will-lead-the-way/

     

    Read more »